[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160901164443.14195.13483.stgit@bhelgaas-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 11:44:43 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Wenrui Li <wenrui.li@...k-chips.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: [PATCH 6/9] Add comment about why 32-bit read/modify/write isn't
safe.
---
drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
index 17612e5..33bf2e1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-rockchip.c
@@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ static int rockchip_pcie_wr_own_conf(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip,
mask = ~(((1 << (size * 8)) - 1) << ((where & 0x3) * 8));
+ /*
+ * N.B. This read/modify/write isn't safe in general because it can
+ * corrupt RW1C bits in adjacent registers. But the hardware
+ * doesn't support smaller writes.
+ */
tmp = readl(rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + offset) & mask;
tmp |= val << ((where & 0x3) * 8);
writel(tmp, rockchip->apb_base + PCIE_RC_CONFIG_BASE + offset);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists