[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b983e71b-c959-ca43-ce7b-b234db6035fa@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:51:49 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>
To: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
CC: <axboe@...nel.dk>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] wbt: add general throttling mechanism
On 09/01/2016 12:05 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig b/lib/Kconfig
>> index d79909dc01ec..5a65a1f91889 100644
>> --- a/lib/Kconfig
>> +++ b/lib/Kconfig
>> @@ -550,4 +550,8 @@ config STACKDEPOT
>> bool
>> select STACKTRACE
>>
>> +config WBT
>> + bool
>> + select SCALE_BITMAP
>
> Looks like this snuck in from your experiments to get this to work on
> top of scale_bitmap?
Oops yes, it is indeed. Killed, thanks.
>> + if (waitqueue_active(&rwb->wait)) {
>> + int diff = limit - inflight;
>> +
>> + if (!inflight || diff >= rwb->wb_background / 2)
>> + wake_up_nr(&rwb->wait, 1);
>
> wake_up(&rwb->wait)?
Yeah, that'd be cleaner. I think this is a leftover from when I
experimented with batched wakeups, with nr != 1. I'll change it to just
wake_up().
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists