[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1472762231-88923-2-git-send-email-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:37:08 -0700
From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
To: rjw@...ysocki.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...e.de, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, alexey.klimov@....com,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] acpi: cppc: Allow build with ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS config
Some newer x86 platforms have support for both _CPC and _PSS object. So
kernel config can have both ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS and ACPI_CPPC_LIB. So remove
restriction for ACPI_CPPC_LIB to build only when ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is not
defined.
Also for legacy systems with only _PSS, we shouldn't bail out if
acpi_cppc_processor_probe() fails, if ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS is also defined.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/Kconfig | 1 -
drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
index 445ce28..c6bb6aa 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/acpi/Kconfig
@@ -227,7 +227,6 @@ config ACPI_MCFG
config ACPI_CPPC_LIB
bool
depends on ACPI_PROCESSOR
- depends on !ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS
select MAILBOX
select PCC
help
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
index 0553aee..f5c92be 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int __acpi_processor_start(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
result = acpi_cppc_processor_probe(pr);
- if (result)
+ if (result && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_CPU_FREQ_PSS))
return -ENODEV;
if (!cpuidle_get_driver() || cpuidle_get_driver() == &acpi_idle_driver)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists