lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 01 Sep 2016 22:43:32 +0200
From:   Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:     Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     Finley Xiao <finley.xiao@...k-chips.com>,
        maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        dianders@...omium.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wxt@...k-chips.com,
        jay.xu@...k-chips.com, huangtao@...k-chips.com, cl@...k-chips.com,
        tony.xie@...k-chips.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] nvmem: rockchip-efuse: support more rockchip SoCs

Hi srini,

Am Donnerstag, 1. September 2016, 21:02:23 schrieb Srinivas Kandagatla:
> On 29/08/16 10:50, Finley Xiao wrote:
> > As the timing and organization of efuse may be different
> > between rockchip SoCs, so their read function may be different.
> > We add different device tree compatible string for rockchip SoCs
> > to match their own read function.
> > 
> > V3->V4:
> > - 3/3 change the type of out_value into u32 and buf into u8, their values
> > 
> >   come from register, use u32 and u8 may be more readable.
> > 
> > Finley Xiao (3):
> >   nvmem: rockchip-efuse: update compatible strings for Rockchip efuse
> >   ARM: dts: rockchip: update compatible strings for Rockchip efuse
> >   nvmem: rockchip-efuse: add rk3399-efuse support
> 
> I can take patch 1 and 3, but dts has to go via arm soc tree.

that is really fine, and also what I somehow expect :-) .

So once you picked these two (I guess after Doug's comments are fixed) I'll 
pick up the dts patch.


Heiko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ