[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BLUPR02MB1683CF8A399E613B8C209C3B81E50@BLUPR02MB1683.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 00:47:30 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <Bart.VanAssche@...disk.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Ott <sebott@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>
CC: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trivial treewide: Convert dev_set_uevent_suppress
argument to bool
On 09/01/16 13:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> Assigning an int to a bitfield:1 can lose precision.
> Change the caller argument uses from 1/0 to true/false.
Hello Joe,
Can you clarify how assigning 0 or 1 to a one-bit bitfield can cause a
loss of precision?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists