[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6414695.LEIYfGPUEg@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 12:43:39 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Leo Li <pku.leo@...il.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Fisher <david.fisher1@...opsys.com>,
"Thang Q. Nguyen" <tqnguyen@....com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev
On Thursday, September 1, 2016 5:14:28 PM CEST Leo Li wrote:
>
> Hi Felipe and Arnd,
>
> It has been a while since the last response to this discussion, but we
> haven't reached an agreement yet! Can we get to a conclusion on if it
> is valid to create child platform device for abstraction purpose? If
> yes, can this child device do DMA by itself?
I'd say it's no problem for a driver to create child devices in order
to represent different aspects of a device, but you should not rely on
those devices working when used with the dma-mapping interfaces.
This used to be simpler back when we could configure the kernel for
only one SoC platform at a time, and the platforms could provide their
own overrides for the dma-mapping interfaces. These days, we rely on
firmware or bootloader to describe various aspects of how DMA is done,
so you can't assume that passing a device without an of_node pointer
or ACPI data into those functions will do the right thing.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists