[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160902135936.GH10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:59:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: ast@...com, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, acme@...nel.org,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com,
daniel@...earbox.net, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, sargun@...gun.me,
Aravinda Prasad <aravinda@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
brendan.d.gregg@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf: add container identifier entry in perf
sample data
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:25:31PM +0530, Hari Bathini wrote:
> >I'm thinking this value is mostly the same for tasks, just like COMM and
>
> I think so, too. Namespaces aren't changed that often for tasks...
>
> >MMAP. Could we therefore not emit (sideband) events whenever a task
> >changes namespace and get the same information but with tons less data?
>
> You mean, something like PERF_RECORD_NAMESPACE that
> emits events on fork, clone, setns..?
Yep.
>
> >That also gives the possibility of recording all namespaces, not just
> >the one.
>
> True. If we record all namespaces, container identifier interpretation
> can be left to the userspace to decide, which is much more flexible...
The only complication is initial state, on record start you'd have to
trawl /proc and generate 'fake' namespace records for all (relevant)
tasks.
We do the same with MMAP records, we parse /proc/$pid/maps for that.
Is this namespace stuff available in /proc somewhere?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists