[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4575445.BeuOIIGatt@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:47:11 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
arm@...nel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/4] ARM: defconfig: Exynos for v4.9
On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:18:56 AM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Expected conflict in multi_v7 - take all the changes:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@@ -135,8 -136,7 +136,8 @@@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
> CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=m
> - CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=m
> + CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y
> +CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y
> CONFIG_QORIQ_CPUFREQ=y
> CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
> CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y
>
>
I pulled this into next/defconfig, but didn't see the conflict,
presumably I'll get it after merging the other branches?
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists