lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4575445.BeuOIIGatt@wuerfel>
Date:   Fri, 02 Sep 2016 17:47:11 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:     Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        arm@...nel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 4/4] ARM: defconfig: Exynos for v4.9

On Tuesday, August 30, 2016 11:18:56 AM CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Expected conflict in multi_v7 - take all the changes:
> 
> --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
> @@@ -135,8 -136,7 +136,8 @@@ CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_ONDEMAND=
>   CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_POWERSAVE=m
>   CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_USERSPACE=m
>   CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE=m
> - CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=m
> + CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y
>  +CONFIG_ARM_IMX6Q_CPUFREQ=y
>   CONFIG_QORIQ_CPUFREQ=y
>   CONFIG_CPU_IDLE=y
>   CONFIG_ARM_CPUIDLE=y
> 
> 

I pulled this into next/defconfig, but didn't see the conflict,
presumably I'll get it after merging the other branches?

	Arnd

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ