linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/3] PCI: hisi: re-architect Hip05/Hip06 controllers driver to preapare for ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57C8DDBD.5070103@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Sep 2016 10:02:37 +0800
From:   Dongdong Liu <liudongdong3@...wei.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     <helgaas@...nel.org>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>, <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>, <pratyush.anand@...il.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jcm@...hat.com>,
        <gabriele.paoloni@...wei.com>, <charles.chenxin@...wei.com>,
        <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 1/3] PCI: hisi: re-architect Hip05/Hip06
 controllers driver to preapare for ACPI

Hi Arnd

在 2016/9/1 22:02, Arnd Bergmann 写道:
>
>> 2. We need to backward compatible with the old dt way config access as below code,
>> so we have to call hisi_pcie_common_cfg_read() when accessing the RC config space.
>> For this, we have to call hisi_pcie_common_cfg_read().
>>
>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-hisi.c
>> static inline int hisi_pcie_cfg_read(struct pcie_port *pp, int where,
>> 		int size, u32 *val)
>> {
>> 	struct hisi_pcie *pcie = to_hisi_pcie(pp);
>>
>> 	return hisi_pcie_common_cfg_read(pcie->reg_base, where, size, val);
>> }
>>
>> static struct pcie_host_ops hisi_pcie_host_ops = {
>> 	.rd_own_conf = hisi_pcie_cfg_read,
>> 	.wr_own_conf = hisi_pcie_cfg_write,
>> 	.link_up = hisi_pcie_link_up,
>> };
>
> I think this would be easier if you separate the ACPI code from the
> DT code and not try to have a common file used for both.
>
> Sharing the config space accessors really isn't worth it when both
> variants are fairly simple to do, but they don't fit in a common
> model because one is called from the ACPI quirks and the other
> is called from the dw-pcie driver with completely different calling
> conventions.

I agree, many thanks.

Thanks
Dongdong
>
> 	ARnd
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> .
>