[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160902221658.GO10153@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 00:16:58 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
USB list <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Memory barrier needed with wake_up_process()?
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:16:54PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Felipe, your tests will show whether my guess was totally off-base.
> For the new people, Felipe is tracking down a problem that involves
> exactly the code sequence listed at the top of the email, where we know
> that the wakeup routine runs but nevertheless the task sleeps. At
> least, that's what it looks like at the moment.
What arch are you seeing this on?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists