linux-kernel - [PATCH] doc: ioctl: Add some clarifications to botching-up-ioctls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1472856144-4659-1-git-send-email-labbott@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri,  2 Sep 2016 15:42:24 -0700
From:   Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: [PATCH] doc: ioctl: Add some clarifications to botching-up-ioctls


- The guide currently says to pad the structure to a multiple of
  64-bits. This is not necessary in cases where the structure contains
  no 64-bit types. Clarify this concept to avoid unnecessary padding.
- When using __u64 to hold user pointers, blindly trying to do a cast to
  a void __user * may generate a warning on 32-bit systems about a cast
  from an integer to a pointer of different size. There is a macro to
  deal with this which hides an ugly double cast. Add a reference to
  this macro.

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
---
I can split these into two separate patches if necessary but it seemed simpler
just to colapse them into a single patch.
---
 Documentation/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.txt | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.txt b/Documentation/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.txt
index cc30b14..36138c6 100644
--- a/Documentation/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.txt
+++ b/Documentation/ioctl/botching-up-ioctls.txt
@@ -34,15 +34,18 @@ will need to add a a 32-bit compat layer:
    64-bit platforms do. So we always need padding to the natural size to get
    this right.
 
- * Pad the entire struct to a multiple of 64-bits - the structure size will
-   otherwise differ on 32-bit versus 64-bit. Having a different structure size
-   hurts when passing arrays of structures to the kernel, or if the kernel
-   checks the structure size, which e.g. the drm core does.
+ * Pad the entire struct to a multiple of 64-bits if the structure contains
+   64-bit types - the structure size will otherwise differ on 32-bit versus
+   64-bit. Having a different structure size hurts when passing arrays of
+   structures to the kernel, or if the kernel checks the structure size, which
+   e.g. the drm core does.
 
  * Pointers are __u64, cast from/to a uintprt_t on the userspace side and
    from/to a void __user * in the kernel. Try really hard not to delay this
    conversion or worse, fiddle the raw __u64 through your code since that
-   diminishes the checking tools like sparse can provide.
+   diminishes the checking tools like sparse can provide. The macro
+   u64_to_user_ptr can be used in the kernel to avoid warnings about integers
+   and pointres of different sizes.
 
 
 Basics
-- 
2.7.4