[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57CAC551.7040505@bfs.de>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:42:57 +0200
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
CC: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
David Hildenbrand <dahi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/17] s390/debug: Return directly if a null pointer was
passed to debug_unregister()
Am 03.09.2016 14:24, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 19:34:45 +0200
>
> Return directly at the beginning if a null pointer was passed for
> the input parameter of this function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> arch/s390/kernel/debug.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c b/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
> index c4a4641..d137150 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/debug.c
> @@ -736,13 +736,10 @@ void
> debug_unregister(debug_info_t * id)
> {
> if (!id)
> - goto out;
> + return;
> mutex_lock(&debug_mutex);
> debug_info_put(id);
> mutex_unlock(&debug_mutex);
> -
> -out:
> - return;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_unregister);
>
debug_info_put() will check for NULL, the whole check can be removed.
re,
wh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists