[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57CAC6AF.5090506@baylibre.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2016 14:48:47 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
linux@...linux.org.uk, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: dts: Add MDM9615 dtsi
Le 26/08/2016 19:55, Stephen Boyd a écrit :
> On 08/23, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..e30bfbd
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-mdm9615.dtsi
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Qualcomm MDM9615";
>> + compatible = "qcom,mdm9615";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
>> +
>> + cpus {
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + cpu0: cpu@0 {
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a5";
>> + device_type = "cpu";
>> + next-level-cache = <&L2>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + cpu-pmu {
>> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a5-pmu";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 10 0x304>;
>
> Should be 0x104? Or GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH?
Yes, and PPI also...
>
>> + };
>> +
>> + clocks {
>> + cxo_board {
>> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
>> + #clock-cells = <0>;
>> + clock-frequency = <19200000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + regulators {
>
> This doesn't need to be a simple bus? so that the child devices
> probe? That's good if so.
It's correct, like the clocks node.
>
>> + vsdcc_fixed: vsdcc-regulator {
>> + compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> + regulator-name = "SDCC Power";
>> + regulator-min-microvolt = <2700000>;
>> + regulator-max-microvolt = <2700000>;
>> + regulator-always-on;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + soc: soc {
> [...]
>> + L2: l2-cache {
>
> Missing unit address.
Done.
>
>> + compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
>> + reg = <0x02040000 0x1000>;
>> + arm,data-latency = <2 2 0>;
>> + cache-unified;
>> + cache-level = <2>;
>> + };
> [..]
>> +
>> + qcom,ssbi@...000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,ssbi";
>> + reg = <0x500000 0x1000>;
>> + qcom,controller-type = "pmic-arbiter";
>> +
>> + pmicintc: pmic@0 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8018", "qcom,pm8921";
>> + interrupts = <GIC_PPI 226 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>> + interrupt-controller;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <0>;
>> +
>> + pwrkey@1c {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8018-pwrkey", "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey";
>> + reg = <0x1c>;
>> + interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> + interrupts = <50 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <51 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
>
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING?
Crap, I'll revert these.
>
>> + debounce = <15625>;
>> + pull-up;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pmicmpp: mpp@50 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8018-mpp", "qcom,ssbi-mpp";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> + interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <25 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <26 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <27 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <28 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <29 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
>
> These are right though.
>
>> + reg = <0x50>;
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + rtc@11d {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8018-rtc", "qcom,pm8921-rtc";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> + interrupts = <39 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
>
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING?
Crap, Crap, reverting...
>
>> + reg = <0x11d>;
>> + allow-set-time;
>> + };
>> +
>> + pmicgpio: gpio@150 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,pm8018-gpio", "qcom,ssbi-gpio";
>> + interrupt-parent = <&pmicintc>;
>> + interrupts = <24 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <25 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <26 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <27 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <28 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>,
>> + <29 IRQ_TYPE_NONE>;
>
> These are right though.
>
>> + gpio-controller;
>> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + rpm: rpm@...000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,rpm-mdm9615";
>> + reg = <0x108000 0x1000>;
>> +
>> + qcom,ipc = <&l2cc 0x8 2>;
>> +
>> + interrupts = <0 19 0>, <0 21 0>, <0 22 0>;
>
> IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING and GIC_SPI?
Exact, will beautify these.
Thanks,
Neil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists