[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9e83d28-296e-00bc-a18c-66fca51c3adf@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2016 09:07:33 +0200
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: sparc: bpf_jit: Move four assignments in bpf_jit_compile()
> In Markus' defence, he does occasionally write okay patches,
> (for example the kmalloc(a * b) => kmalloc_array(a, b) changes
> get my small tick of approval)
Thanks for another bit of acceptance for this kind of software change.
> however he also submits a lot of patches which are little more than moving stuff around
This is true to some degree.
> pointlessly.
Do we agree to disagree on the value of some collateral software evolutions
I'm proposing for a while?
> I really wish he'd concentrate on the former rather than the latter.
I am on the way for such a software development adventure.
There are further improvement opportunities to consider besides the main route,
aren't there?
> He's not another Nick Krause.
Are you going to remember me under an other nickname anyhow?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists