[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905105011.GL31424@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 12:50:11 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, patrice.chotard@...com,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] pwm: sti: Initialise PWM Capture device data
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 10:35:03AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Each PWM Capture device is allocated a structure to hold its own
> state. During a capture the device may be partaking in one of 3
> phases. Initial (rising) phase change, a subsequent (falling)
> phase change indicating end of the duty-cycle phase and finally
> a final (rising) phase change indicating the end of the period.
> The timer value snapshot each event is held in a variable of the
> same name, and the phase number (0, 1, 2) is contained in the
> index variable. Other device specific information, such as GPIO
> pin, the IRQ wait queue and locking is also contained in the
> structure. This patch initialises this structure for each of
> the available devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Applied this with two small changes. See below.
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-sti.c
[...]
> +struct sti_cpt_ddata {
> + u32 snapshot[3];
> + int index;
I made this unsigned int because it never needs to be negative.
> @@ -350,6 +366,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct sti_pwm_compat_data *cdata;
> struct sti_pwm_chip *pc;
> struct resource *res;
> + unsigned int devnum;
Renamed this variable to "i" because it's...
> int ret;
>
> pc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pc), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -378,7 +395,8 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cdata->reg_fields = &sti_pwm_regfields[0];
> cdata->max_prescale = 0xff;
> cdata->max_pwm_cnt = 255;
> - cdata->num_devs = 1;
> + cdata->pwm_num_devs = 1;
> + cdata->cpt_num_devs = 0;
>
> pc->cdata = cdata;
> pc->dev = dev;
> @@ -416,7 +434,7 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pc->chip.dev = dev;
> pc->chip.ops = &sti_pwm_ops;
> pc->chip.base = -1;
> - pc->chip.npwm = pc->cdata->num_devs;
> + pc->chip.npwm = pc->cdata->pwm_num_devs;
> pc->chip.can_sleep = true;
>
> ret = pwmchip_add(&pc->chip);
> @@ -426,6 +444,19 @@ static int sti_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> + for (devnum = 0; devnum < cdata->cpt_num_devs; devnum++) {
... usage here becomes more idiomatic.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists