[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905023935.GA24593@b29397-desktop>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:39:35 +0800
From: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <stephen.boyd@...aro.org>
Cc: Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Peter Chen <peter.chen@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Ivan T. Ivanov" <iivanov.xz@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/22] usb: chipidea: Consolidate extcon notifiers
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 06:03:06PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 05:40:24PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> if (cable->state)
> >> - val |= OTGSC_ID;
> >> + val &= ~OTGSC_ID; /* A device */
> >> else
> >> - val &= ~OTGSC_ID;
> >> + val |= OTGSC_ID; /* B device */
One more comment, would you change the comment to "host" and "device"?
Unless we are supporting OTG-compliance device, otherwise, we should
not mention "A" or "B" for USB device.
Peter
> >>
> >> if (cable->enabled)
> >> val |= OTGSC_IDIE;
> >
> > /**
> > * struct ci_hdrc_cable - structure for external connector cable state tracking
> > * @state: current state of the line
> >
> > You may change the name of variable "state" to "connected", per I
> > understand, it has changed to the meaning of connected status for your patch.
> >
>
> Ok sure.
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists