[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1473093097-30932-1-git-send-email-punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:31:30 +0100
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [RFC v2 PATCH 0/7] Add support for monitoring guest TLB operations
Hi,
Although there are no PMU events to monitor TLB operations, ARMv8
supports trapping guest TLB maintenance operations to the
hypervisor. This trapping mechanism can be used to monitor the use of
guest TLB instructions.
As taking a trap for every TLB operation can have significant
overhead, trapping should only be enabled -
* on user request
* for the VM of interest
This patchset adds support to listen to perf trace event state change
notifications. The notifications and associated context are then used
to enable trapping of guest TLB operations when requested by the
user. The trap handling generates trace events (kvm_tlb_invalidate)
which can already be counted using existing perf trace
functionality.
I would appreciate feedback on the approach to tie the control of TLB
monitoring with perf trace events (Patch 1) especially if there are
any suggestions on avoiding (or reducing) the overhead of "perf trace"
notifications.
I looked at using regfunc/unregfunc tracepoint hooks but they don't
include the event context. But the bigger problem was that the
callbacks are only called on the first instance of simultaneously
executing perf stat invocations.
The patchset is based on v4.8-rc5 and adds support for monitoring
guest TLB operations on 64bit hosts. If the approach taken in the
patches is acceptable, I'll add 32bit host support as well.
This is the second posting of this patchset. Earlier discussion can be
found at [0].
Changes:
RFC -> RFC v2
* Patch 4 - Rename left-over TLBI macro to __TLBI
* Patch 6 - Replace individual TLB operation emulation with
invalidating all stage 1 TLB for the VM. TLB monitoring is expected
to be a debug feature and performance is not critical.
With this patchset, 'perf' tool when attached to a VM process can be
used to monitor the TLB operations. E.g., to monitor a VM with process
id 4166 -
# perf stat -e "kvm:kvm_tlb_invalidate" -p 4166
Perform some operations in VM (running 'make -j 7' on the kernel
sources in this instance). Breaking out of perf shows -
Performance counter stats for process id '4166':
7,471,974 kvm:kvm_tlb_invalidate
374.235405282 seconds time elapsed
All feedback welcome.
Thanks,
Punit
[0] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1210715.html
Mark Rutland (2):
arm64: tlbflush.h: add __tlbi() macro
arm64/kvm: hyp: tlb: use __tlbi() helper
Punit Agrawal (5):
perf/trace: Add notification for perf trace events
KVM: Track the pid of the VM process
KVM: arm/arm64: Register perf trace event notifier
arm64: KVM: Handle trappable TLB instructions
arm64: KVM: Enable selective trapping of TLB instructions
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 +
arch/arm/kvm/arm.c | 2 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 1 +
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 31 ++++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 4 +
arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/tlb.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm64/kvm/perf_trace.c | 154 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kvm/trace.h | 16 ++++
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 1 +
include/linux/trace_events.h | 3 +
kernel/trace/trace_event_perf.c | 24 ++++++
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 2 +
15 files changed, 398 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/perf_trace.c
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists