lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  5 Sep 2016 18:44:02 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Hubert Chrzaniuk <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com, lukasz.odzioba@...el.com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4.7 066/143] EDAC, sb_edac: Fix channel reporting on Knights Landing

4.7-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lukasz Odzioba <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>

commit c5b48fa7e298b9a8968a1c1fc0ef013069ca2dd2 upstream.

On Intel Xeon Phi Knights Landing processor family the channels of the
memory controller have untypical arrangement - MC0 is mapped to CH3,4,5
and MC1 is mapped to CH0,1,2. This causes the EDAC driver to report the
channel name incorrectly.

We missed this change earlier, so the code already contains similar
comment, but the translation function is incorrect.

Without this patch:
  errors in DIMM_A and DIMM_D were reported in DIMM_D
  errors in DIMM_B and DIMM_E were reported in DIMM_E
  errors in DIMM_C and DIMM_F were reported in DIMM_F

Correct this.

Hubert Chrzaniuk:
 - rebased to 4.8
 - comments and code cleanup

Fixes: d0cdf9003140 ("sb_edac: Add Knights Landing (Xeon Phi gen 2) support")
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Hubert Chrzaniuk <hubert.chrzaniuk@...el.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: lukasz.anaczkowski@...el.com
Cc: lukasz.odzioba@...el.com
Cc: mchehab@...nel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1469231089-22837-1-git-send-email-lukasz.odzioba@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Odzioba <lukasz.odzioba@...el.com>
[ Boris: Simplify a bit by removing char mc. ]
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c |   15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -552,9 +552,9 @@ static const struct pci_id_table pci_dev
 /* Knight's Landing Support */
 /*
  * KNL's memory channels are swizzled between memory controllers.
- * MC0 is mapped to CH3,5,6 and MC1 is mapped to CH0,1,2
+ * MC0 is mapped to CH3,4,5 and MC1 is mapped to CH0,1,2
  */
-#define knl_channel_remap(channel) ((channel + 3) % 6)
+#define knl_channel_remap(mc, chan) ((mc) ? (chan) : (chan) + 3)
 
 /* Memory controller, TAD tables, error injection - 2-8-0, 2-9-0 (2 of these) */
 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_KNL_IMC_MC       0x7840
@@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static u32 knl_get_mc_route(int entry, u
 	mc = GET_BITFIELD(reg, entry*3, (entry*3)+2);
 	chan = GET_BITFIELD(reg, (entry*2) + 18, (entry*2) + 18 + 1);
 
-	return knl_channel_remap(mc*3 + chan);
+	return knl_channel_remap(mc, chan);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2997,8 +2997,15 @@ static void sbridge_mce_output_error(str
 		} else {
 			char A = *("A");
 
-			channel = knl_channel_remap(channel);
+			/*
+			 * Reported channel is in range 0-2, so we can't map it
+			 * back to mc. To figure out mc we check machine check
+			 * bank register that reported this error.
+			 * bank15 means mc0 and bank16 means mc1.
+			 */
+			channel = knl_channel_remap(m->bank == 16, channel);
 			channel_mask = 1 << channel;
+
 			snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg),
 				"%s%s err_code:%04x:%04x channel:%d (DIMM_%c)",
 				overflow ? " OVERFLOW" : "",


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ