lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon,  5 Sep 2016 18:44:27 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 064/113] sched/nohz: Fix affine unpinned timers mess

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>

commit 444969223c81c7d0a95136b7b4cfdcfbc96ac5bd upstream.

The following commit:

  9642d18eee2c ("nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers")'

intended to affine unpinned timers to housekeepers:

  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
  unpinned timers(houserkeepers, idle)    =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to itself)

However, the !idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu) check modified the
intention to:

  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   any housekeepers(no mattter cpu topology)
  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   any housekeepers(no mattter cpu topology)
  unpinned timers(housekeepers, idle)     =>   any busy cpus(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)

This patch fixes it by checking if there are busy housekeepers nearby,
otherwise falls to any housekeepers/itself. After the patch:

  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, idle)   =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
  unpinned timers(full dynaticks, busy)   =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to any housekeepers)
  unpinned timers(housekeepers, idle)     =>   nearest busy housekeepers(otherwise, fallback to itself)

Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
[ Fixed the changelog. ]
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 'commit 9642d18eee2c ("nohz: Affine unpinned timers to housekeepers")'
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1462344334-8303-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -627,7 +627,10 @@ int get_nohz_timer_target(void)
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
 		for_each_cpu(i, sched_domain_span(sd)) {
-			if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(cpu)) {
+			if (cpu == i)
+				continue;
+
+			if (!idle_cpu(i) && is_housekeeping_cpu(i)) {
 				cpu = i;
 				goto unlock;
 			}


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ