lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160905164353.658914640@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  5 Sep 2016 18:45:09 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 106/113] ACPI / drivers: replace acpi_probe_lock spinlock with mutex

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>

commit 5331d9cab32ef640b4cd38a43b0858874fbb7168 upstream.

Commit e647b532275b ("ACPI: Add early device probing infrastructure")
introduced code that allows inserting driver specific
struct acpi_probe_entry probe entries into ACPI linker sections
(one per-subsystem, eg irqchip, clocksource) that are then walked
to retrieve the data and function hooks required to probe the
respective kernel components.

Probing for all entries in a section is triggered through
the __acpi_probe_device_table() function, that in turn, according
to the table ID a given probe entry reports parses the table
with the function retrieved from the respective section structures
(ie struct acpi_probe_entry). Owing to the current ACPI table
parsing implementation, the __acpi_probe_device_table() function
has to share global variables with the acpi_match_madt() function, so
in order to guarantee mutual exclusion locking is required
between the two functions.

Current kernel code implements the locking through the acpi_probe_lock
spinlock; this has the side effect of requiring all code called
within the lock (ie struct acpi_probe_entry.probe_{table/subtbl} hooks)
not to sleep.

However, kernel subsystems that make use of the early probing
infrastructure are relying on kernel APIs that may sleep (eg
irq_domain_alloc_fwnode(), among others) in the function calls
pointed at by struct acpi_probe_entry.{probe_table/subtbl} entries
(eg gic_v2_acpi_init()), which is a bug.

Since __acpi_probe_device_table() is called from context
that is allowed to sleep the acpi_probe_lock spinlock can be replaced
with a mutex; this fixes the issue whilst still guaranteeing
mutual exclusion.

Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Fixes: e647b532275b (ACPI: Add early device probing infrastructure)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1958,7 +1958,7 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 
 static struct acpi_probe_entry *ape;
 static int acpi_probe_count;
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acpi_probe_lock);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_probe_mutex);
 
 static int __init acpi_match_madt(struct acpi_subtable_header *header,
 				  const unsigned long end)
@@ -1977,7 +1977,7 @@ int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(str
 	if (acpi_disabled)
 		return 0;
 
-	spin_lock(&acpi_probe_lock);
+	mutex_lock(&acpi_probe_mutex);
 	for (ape = ap_head; nr; ape++, nr--) {
 		if (ACPI_COMPARE_NAME(ACPI_SIG_MADT, ape->id)) {
 			acpi_probe_count = 0;
@@ -1990,7 +1990,7 @@ int __init __acpi_probe_device_table(str
 				count++;
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&acpi_probe_lock);
+	mutex_unlock(&acpi_probe_mutex);
 
 	return count;
 }


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ