[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160905064441.GD3532@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2016 08:44:41 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
Enric Balletbo <enric.balletbo@...labora.co.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: cros_ec: add __packed to prevent padding
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:22:13AM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> While the particular usage in question is likely safe (struct
> cros_ec_command is 32-bit aligned, followed by <=32-bit fields), it's
> been suggested this is not a great pattern to follow for the general
> case -- for example, if we follow a 'struct cros_ec_command' (which is
> 32-bit- but not 64-bit-aligned) with a struct that starts with a 64-bit
> type (e.g., u64), the compiler may add padding.
>
> Let's add __packed, to inform the compiler of our true intention -- to
> have no padding between these struct elements -- and to future proof for
> any refactorings that might occur.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> ---
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I don't know of any bugs directly resolved by this patch, so take it for
> v4.8/v4.9 at your discretion.
>
> drivers/pwm/pwm-cros-ec.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (802 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists