[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160906091025.20726b83@mschwide>
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:10:25 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/crypto: initialize ret to zero to avoid returning
garbage value
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 17:21:18 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> static analysis with cppcheck detected that ret is not initialized
> and hence garbage is potentially being returned in the case where
> prng_data->ppnows.reseed_counter <= prng_reseed_limit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/crypto/prng.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/prng.c b/arch/s390/crypto/prng.c
> index 79e3a1f..a21fdf4 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/prng.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/prng.c
> @@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int prng_sha512_reseed(void)
>
> static int prng_sha512_generate(u8 *buf, size_t nbytes)
> {
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> /* reseed needed ? */
> if (prng_data->ppnows.reseed_counter > prng_reseed_limit) {
This issue has been introduced by git commit 0177db01adf26cf9
"s390/crypto: simplify return code handling" which is only on
the features branch right now. And to set ret=0 does not fix
the problem. The correct fix is to return nbytes.
Still a good catch though.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists