Message-ID: <87d1khv38p.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 06 Sep 2016 10:31:18 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Cc:     Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
        Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
        Wei Chen <Wei.Chen@....com>, Kaly Xin <Kaly.Xin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux v3 3/9] xen: introduce xen_vcpu_id mapping

Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org> writes:

> On Mon, 5 Sep 2016, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com> writes:
>> 
>> > Hi Vitaly,
>> >
>> > On 26/07/16 13:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> >> It may happen that Xen's and Linux's ideas of vCPU id diverge. In
>> >> particular, when we crash on a secondary vCPU we may want to do kdump
>> >> and unlike plain kexec where we do migrate_to_reboot_cpu() we try booting
>> >> on the vCPU which crashed. This doesn't work very well for PVHVM guests as
>> >> we have a number of hypercalls where we pass vCPU id as a parameter. These
>> >> hypercalls either fail or do something unexpected. To solve the issue
>> >> introduce percpu xen_vcpu_id mapping. ARM and PV guests get direct mapping
>> >> for now. Boot CPU for PVHVM guest gets its id from CPUID. With secondary
>> >> CPUs it is a bit more trickier. Currently, we initialize IPI vectors
>> >> before these CPUs boot so we can't use CPUID. Use ACPI ids from MADT
>> >> instead.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> Changes since v2:
>> >> - Use uint32_t for xen_vcpu_id mapping [Julien Grall]
>> >>
>> >> Changes since v1:
>> >> - Introduce xen_vcpu_nr() helper [David Vrabel]
>> >> - Use ACPI ids instead of vLAPIC ids /2 [Andrew Cooper, Jan Beulich]
>> >> ---
>> >>  arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> >>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> >>  include/xen/xen-ops.h    |  6 ++++++
>> >>  3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> >> index 75cd734..fe32267 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> >> @@ -46,6 +46,10 @@ struct shared_info *HYPERVISOR_shared_info = (void *)&xen_dummy_shared_info;
>> >>  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vcpu_info *, xen_vcpu);
>> >>  static struct vcpu_info __percpu *xen_vcpu_info;
>> >>
>> >> +/* Linux <-> Xen vCPU id mapping */
>> >> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(uint32_t, xen_vcpu_id) = U32_MAX;
>> >> +EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(xen_vcpu_id);
>> >> +
>> >>  /* These are unused until we support booting "pre-ballooned" */
>> >>  unsigned long xen_released_pages;
>> >>  struct xen_memory_region xen_extra_mem[XEN_EXTRA_MEM_MAX_REGIONS] __initdata;
>> >> @@ -179,6 +183,9 @@ static void xen_percpu_init(void)
>> >>  	pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
>> >>  	vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
>> >>
>> >> +	/* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
>> >> +	per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
>> >> +
>> >
>> > We did some internal testing on ARM64 with the latest Linux kernel
>> > (4.8-rc4) and noticed that this patch is breaking SMP support. Sorry
>> > for noticing the issue that late.
>> 
>> Sorry for the breakage :-(
>> 
>> >
>> > This function is called on the running CPU whilst some code (e.g
>> > init_control_block in drivers/xen/events/events_fifo.c) is executed
>> > whilst preparing the CPU on the boot CPU.
>> >
>> > So xen_vcpu_nr(cpu) will always return 0 in this case and
>> > init_control_block will fail to execute.
>> >
>> 
>> I see,
>> 
>> CPU_UP_PREPARE event happens before xen_starting_cpu() is called.
>> 
>> 
>> > I am not sure how to fix. I guess we could setup per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id,
>> > *) in xen_guest_init. Any opinions?
>> 
>> As we're not doing kexec on ARM we can fix the immediate issue. I don't
>> know much about ARM and unfortunatelly I don't have a setup to test but
>> it seems there is no early_per_cpu* infrastructure for ARM so we may fix
>> it with the following:
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> index 3d2cef6..f193414 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c
>> @@ -170,9 +170,6 @@ static int xen_starting_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
>>         pr_info("Xen: initializing cpu%d\n", cpu);
>>         vcpup = per_cpu_ptr(xen_vcpu_info, cpu);
>>  
>> -       /* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
>> -       per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
>> -
>>         info.mfn = virt_to_gfn(vcpup);
>>         info.offset = xen_offset_in_page(vcpup);
>>  
>> @@ -330,6 +327,7 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>>  {
>>         struct xen_add_to_physmap xatp;
>>         struct shared_info *shared_info_page = NULL;
>> +       int cpu;
>>  
>>         if (!xen_domain())
>>                 return 0;
>> @@ -380,7 +378,8 @@ static int __init xen_guest_init(void)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>  
>>         /* Direct vCPU id mapping for ARM guests. */
>> -       per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, 0) = 0;
>> +       for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
>> +               per_cpu(xen_vcpu_id, cpu) = cpu;
>>  
>>         xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.count = gnttab_max_grant_frames();
>>         if (xen_xlate_map_ballooned_pages(&xen_auto_xlat_grant_frames.pfn,
>> 
>> (not tested, if we can't use for_each_possible_cpu() that early we'll
>> have to check against NR_CPUS instead).
>
> Kind of defeat the purpose of xen_vcpu_id, but I guess it should work.
>
>> But unfortunatelly we'll have to get back to this in future. Turns out
>> we need to know Xen's idea of vCPU id _before_ this vCPU starts
>> executing code.
>
> Why?

E.g. for FIFO event channels we currently call
evtchn_fifo_cpu_notification() for CPU_UP_PREPARE event (and do a
hypercall which requires us to know vcpu id) and this happens before the
secodary cpu starts. I'm not sure this can't be changed in future.

>
>> On x86 we used ACPI_ID from MADT. Is there anything like
>> it on ARM?
>
> MPIDR: 
>
> http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0388e/CIHEBGFG.html
>

Thanks, but doesn't it work the same way CPUID instruction works? In
that case we won't be able to use it to figure out other CPU's id.

> But first we should formally document the relationship between MPIDR and
> vcpu id.

Of course.

-- 
  Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists