lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160906103926.GH30513@cbox>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:39:26 +0200
From:   Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 PATCH 4/7] arm64: tlbflush.h: add __tlbi() macro

On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 11:05:17AM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@...aro.org> writes:
> 
> > On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 05:31:34PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> >> From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> >> 
> >> As with dsb() and isb(), add a __tlbi() helper so that we can avoid
> >> distracting asm boilerplate every time we want a TLBI. As some TLBI
> >> operations take an argument while others do not, some pre-processor is
> >> used to handle these two cases with different assembly blocks.
> >> 
> >> The existing tlbflush.h code is moved over to use the helper.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> >> [ rename helper to __tlbi, update commit log ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> >> index b460ae2..e9e42a7 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h
> >> @@ -25,6 +25,21 @@
> >>  #include <asm/cputype.h>
> >>  
> >>  /*
> >> + * Raw TLBI operations. Drivers and most kernel code should use the TLB
> >> + * management routines below in preference to these. Where necessary, these can
> >
> > in preference to these?
> >
> >> + * be used to avoid asm() boilerplate.
> >
> > 'these' seem to be a bit overloaded in this commentary.
> >
> 
> I've locally updated the comment to - 
> 
> "Raw TLBI operations.
> 
> Where necessary, use the __tlbi macro to avoid asm()
> boilerplate. *Note:* Drivers and most kernel code should use the
> TLB management routines in preference to the macros."
> 
> Is that better?

Yes.  I would get rid of the *Note:* part, but that's really
nit-picking.

Thanks,
-Christoffer

> 
> >> + *
> >> + * Can be used as __tlbi(op) or __tlbi(op, arg), depending on whether a
> >> + * particular TLBI op takes an argument or not. The macros below handle invoking
> >> + * the asm with or without the register argument as appropriate.
> >> + */
> >> +#define __TLBI_0(op, arg)		asm ("tlbi " #op)
> >> +#define __TLBI_1(op, arg)		asm ("tlbi " #op ", %0" : : "r" (arg))
> >> +#define __TLBI_N(op, arg, n, ...)	__TLBI_##n(op, arg)
> >> +
> >> +#define __tlbi(op, ...)		__TLBI_N(op, ##__VA_ARGS__, 1, 0)
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >>   *	TLB Management
> >>   *	==============
> >>   *
> >> @@ -66,7 +81,7 @@
> >>  static inline void local_flush_tlb_all(void)
> >>  {
> >>  	dsb(nshst);
> >> -	asm("tlbi	vmalle1");
> >> +	__tlbi(vmalle1);
> >>  	dsb(nsh);
> >>  	isb();
> >>  }
> >> @@ -74,7 +89,7 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_all(void)
> >>  static inline void flush_tlb_all(void)
> >>  {
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >> -	asm("tlbi	vmalle1is");
> >> +	__tlbi(vmalle1is);
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  	isb();
> >>  }
> >> @@ -84,7 +99,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> >>  	unsigned long asid = ASID(mm) << 48;
> >>  
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >> -	asm("tlbi	aside1is, %0" : : "r" (asid));
> >> +	__tlbi(aside1is, asid);
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -94,7 +109,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >>  	unsigned long addr = uaddr >> 12 | (ASID(vma->vm_mm) << 48);
> >>  
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >> -	asm("tlbi	vale1is, %0" : : "r" (addr));
> >> +	__tlbi(vale1is, addr);
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> @@ -122,9 +137,9 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >>  	for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 12)) {
> >>  		if (last_level)
> >> -			asm("tlbi vale1is, %0" : : "r"(addr));
> >> +			__tlbi(vale1is, addr);
> >>  		else
> >> -			asm("tlbi vae1is, %0" : : "r"(addr));
> >> +			__tlbi(vae1is, addr);
> >>  	}
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  }
> >> @@ -149,7 +164,7 @@ static inline void flush_tlb_kernel_range(unsigned long start, unsigned long end
> >>  
> >>  	dsb(ishst);
> >>  	for (addr = start; addr < end; addr += 1 << (PAGE_SHIFT - 12))
> >> -		asm("tlbi vaae1is, %0" : : "r"(addr));
> >> +		__tlbi(vaae1is, addr);
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  	isb();
> >>  }
> >> @@ -163,7 +178,7 @@ static inline void __flush_tlb_pgtable(struct mm_struct *mm,
> >>  {
> >>  	unsigned long addr = uaddr >> 12 | (ASID(mm) << 48);
> >>  
> >> -	asm("tlbi	vae1is, %0" : : "r" (addr));
> >> +	__tlbi(vae1is, addr);
> >>  	dsb(ish);
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> -- 
> >> 2.8.1
> >> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > kvmarm mailing list
> > kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
> > https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ