linux-kernel - Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 13:25:03 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: ACPI-APEI-HEST: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:38 AM, SF Markus Elfring
<elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>> Like in the other patch series I've just commented,
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
>
>> please put all label renames into one patch.
>
> Could you accept these update suggestions generally?
>
>
> I would prefer to avoid squashing special changes together by default.

Well, as I said elsewhere, if you make the same type of change in
multiple places in one piece of code (or code maintained by the same
maintainer), you make it easier to review those changes if they go in
one patch.

Thanks,
Rafael