linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] ARM: common/locomo: remove NO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4429009.oMpylzDcbd@wuerfel>
Date:   Tue, 06 Sep 2016 17:20:47 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: common/locomo: remove NO_IRQ check

The locomo driver uses two irq numbers, its own IRQ as passed
in the platform resources, and the base number for the interupts
of its child devices, passed in platform_data.

Since commit 489447380a29 ("[PATCH] handle errors returned by
platform_get_irq*()") ten years ago, the locomo driver refuses to
work without an interrupt line passed in its resources, so the
check comparing lchip->irq to NO_IRQ is unnecessary.

We still check the irq_base provided in the platform_data for
NO_IRQ, but as both platforms that use locomo (poodle and collie)
provide an irq_base, this can be done more consistently
by just checking that both are valid in the probe function
and otherwise returning an error.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
---
v2: add back NULL pointer check, clarify changelog

diff --git a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
index 0e97b4b871f9..38ca2db0cf12 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/locomo.c
@@ -253,8 +253,7 @@ locomo_init_one_child(struct locomo *lchip, struct locomo_dev_info *info)
 		dev->mapbase = 0;
 	dev->length = info->length;
 
-	dev->irq[0] = (lchip->irq_base == NO_IRQ) ?
-			NO_IRQ : lchip->irq_base + info->irq[0];
+	dev->irq[0] = lchip->irq_base + info->irq[0];
 
 	ret = device_register(&dev->dev);
 	if (ret) {
@@ -376,6 +375,9 @@ __locomo_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
 	unsigned long r;
 	int i, ret = -ENODEV;
 
+	if (!pdata || !pdata->irq_base)
+		return ret;
+
 	lchip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct locomo), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!lchip)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -387,7 +389,7 @@ __locomo_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
 
 	lchip->phys = mem->start;
 	lchip->irq = irq;
-	lchip->irq_base = (pdata) ? pdata->irq_base : NO_IRQ;
+	lchip->irq_base = pdata->irq_base;
 
 	/*
 	 * Map the whole region.  This also maps the
@@ -454,8 +456,7 @@ __locomo_probe(struct device *me, struct resource *mem, int irq)
 	 * The interrupt controller must be initialised before any
 	 * other device to ensure that the interrupts are available.
 	 */
-	if (lchip->irq != NO_IRQ && lchip->irq_base != NO_IRQ)
-		locomo_setup_irq(lchip);
+	locomo_setup_irq(lchip);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(locomo_devices); i++)
 		locomo_init_one_child(lchip, &locomo_devices[i]);
@@ -476,9 +477,7 @@ static void __locomo_remove(struct locomo *lchip)
 {
 	device_for_each_child(lchip->dev, NULL, locomo_remove_child);
 
-	if (lchip->irq != NO_IRQ) {
-		irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(lchip->irq, NULL, NULL);
-	}
+	irq_set_chained_handler_and_data(lchip->irq, NULL, NULL);
 
 	iounmap(lchip->base);
 	kfree(lchip);