linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early encryption/decryption of memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160906161249.3ckotvocwuukhjws@pd.tnic>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:12:49 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
        Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/20] x86: Add support for early
 encryption/decryption of memory

On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 05:37:10PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This adds support to be able to either encrypt or decrypt data during
> the early stages of booting the kernel. This does not change the memory
> encryption attribute - it is used for ensuring that data present in
> either an encrypted or un-encrypted memory area is in the proper state
> (for example the initrd will have been loaded by the boot loader and
> will not be encrypted, but the memory that it resides in is marked as
> encrypted).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> ---

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> index 00eb705..f35a646 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/mem_encrypt.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,107 @@
>  #include <linux/mm.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/mem_encrypt.h>
> +#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
> +#include <asm/fixmap.h>
> +
> +/* Buffer used for early in-place encryption by BSP, no locking needed */
> +static char me_early_buffer[PAGE_SIZE] __aligned(PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +/*
> + * This routine does not change the underlying encryption setting of the
> + * page(s) that map this memory. It assumes that eventually the memory is
> + * meant to be accessed as encrypted but the contents are currently not
> + * encyrpted.

s/encyrpted/encrypted/

Ditto below.

> + */
> +void __init sme_early_mem_enc(resource_size_t paddr, unsigned long size)
> +{
> +	void *src, *dst;
> +	size_t len;
> +
> +	if (!sme_me_mask)
> +		return;
> +
> +	local_flush_tlb();
> +	wbinvd();
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * There are limited number of early mapping slots, so map (at most)
> +	 * one page at time.
> +	 */
> +	while (size) {
> +		len = min_t(size_t, sizeof(me_early_buffer), size);
> +
> +		/* Create a mapping for non-encrypted write-protected memory */
> +		src = early_memremap_dec_wp(paddr, len);
> +
> +		/* Create a mapping for encrypted memory */
> +		dst = early_memremap_enc(paddr, len);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If a mapping can't be obtained to perform the encryption,
> +		 * then encrypted access to that area will end up causing
> +		 * a crash.
> +		 */
> +		BUG_ON(!src || !dst);
> +
> +		memcpy(me_early_buffer, src, len);
> +		memcpy(dst, me_early_buffer, len);
> +
> +		early_memunmap(dst, len);
> +		early_memunmap(src, len);
> +
> +		paddr += len;
> +		size -= len;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * This routine does not change the underlying encryption setting of the
> + * page(s) that map this memory. It assumes that eventually the memory is
> + * meant to be accessed as not encrypted but the contents are currently
> + * encyrpted.
> + */
> +void __init sme_early_mem_dec(resource_size_t paddr, unsigned long size)
> +{

...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.