linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf, bts: Fallout from the fuzzer for perf/urgent

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160906171915.GA8963@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Sep 2016 19:19:15 +0200
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] perf, bts: Fallout from the fuzzer for perf/urgent


* Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> There were more bugs since the previous version, plus the BTS barriers got 
> fixed. With these patches, my testcase keeps running and no spurious NMI 
> warnings pop up any more.

Could you please also run the fuzzer that Vince uses, does it now pass on hardware 
you have access to?

I'd like to make "passes the fuzzer" a standard requirement before new changes are 
accepted to perf core.

Thanks,

	Ingo