[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67318cf8-36fd-bc0a-e15e-21c30d01dccf@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 11:36:37 +0100
From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, will.deacon@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, james.morse@....com,
ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] arm64: Use consistent naming for errata handling
Hi,
On 05/09/16 10:58, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> This is a cosmetic change to rename the functions dealing with
> the errata work arounds to be more consistent with their naming.
>
> 1) check_local_cpu_errata() => update_cpu_errata_workarounds()
> check_local_cpu_errata() actually updates the system's errata work
> arounds. So rename it to reflect the same.
Which was a pretty obvious misnomer as its only action is to call
update_cpu_capabilities() ;-)
>
> 2) verify_local_cpu_errata() => verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds()
> Use errata_workarounds instead of _errata.
Yes, this makes sense.
Acked-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Thanks!
Andre.
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 4 ++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index df47969..8289295 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -194,10 +194,10 @@ void __init setup_cpu_features(void);
> void update_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps,
> const char *info);
> void enable_cpu_capabilities(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps);
> -void check_local_cpu_errata(void);
> +void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void);
> void __init enable_errata_workarounds(void);
>
> -void verify_local_cpu_errata(void);
> +void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void);
> void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void);
>
> u64 read_system_reg(u32 id);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index 82b0fc2..5836b3d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
> * and the related information is freed soon after. If the new CPU requires
> * an errata not detected at boot, fail this CPU.
> */
> -void verify_local_cpu_errata(void)
> +void verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
> {
> const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *caps = arm64_errata;
>
> @@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ void verify_local_cpu_errata(void)
> }
> }
>
> -void check_local_cpu_errata(void)
> +void update_cpu_errata_workarounds(void)
> {
> update_cpu_capabilities(arm64_errata, "enabling workaround for");
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 4a19138d..643c856 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1018,7 +1018,7 @@ void verify_local_cpu_capabilities(void)
> if (!sys_caps_initialised)
> return;
>
> - verify_local_cpu_errata();
> + verify_local_cpu_errata_workarounds();
> verify_local_cpu_features(arm64_features);
> verify_local_elf_hwcaps(arm64_elf_hwcaps);
> if (system_supports_32bit_el0())
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> index ed1b84f..4fa7b73 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuinfo.c
> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static void __cpuinfo_store_cpu(struct cpuinfo_arm64 *info)
>
> cpuinfo_detect_icache_policy(info);
>
> - check_local_cpu_errata();
> + update_cpu_errata_workarounds();
> }
>
> void cpuinfo_store_cpu(void)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists