[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1473246088-780-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:01:28 +0800
From: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
To: mark.yao@...k-chips.com, airlied@...ux.ie, heiko@...ech.de
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arnd@...db.de, baoyou.xie@...aro.org, xie.baoyou@....com.cn
Subject: [PATCH] drm/rockchip: mark symbols static where possible
We get 2 warnings when building kernel with W=1:
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c:309:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rockchip_drm_fb_suspend' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c:318:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rockchip_drm_fb_resume' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
In fact, these functions are only used in the file in which they are
declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static.
So this patch marks these functions with 'static'.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
index a822d49..3723683 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/rockchip_drm_drv.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static struct drm_driver rockchip_drm_driver = {
};
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
-void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
+static void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
{
struct rockchip_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ void rockchip_drm_fb_suspend(struct drm_device *drm)
console_unlock();
}
-void rockchip_drm_fb_resume(struct drm_device *drm)
+static void rockchip_drm_fb_resume(struct drm_device *drm)
{
struct rockchip_drm_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists