linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpio: pca953x: coding style fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1473247046.11323.37.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 07 Sep 2016 14:17:26 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:     linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpio: pca953x: coding style fixes

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:24 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pca953x_gpio_set_multiple() has some coding style issues that make it
> harder to read. Tweak the code a bit.
> 

I would suggest to make this a last patch in the series. Rationale is
that you might have changed same lines by functional changes and the
first patch in such cases just makes a noise. More important, easier way
to back port if anyone is interested in that.

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy