linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: pca953x: remove an unused variable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 07 Sep 2016 15:17:46 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] gpio: pca953x: remove an unused variable

On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 13:40 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> 2016-09-07 13:36 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.in
> tel.com>:
> > 
> > On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 11:24 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > 
> > > The chip_type variable in struct pca953x_chip is no longer
> > > required.
> > > 
> > > Remove it.
> > 
> > Would it be patch 4 in the series?
> 
> Hi Andy,
> 
> I'm afraid I don't understand the question. Could you elaborate?

Same as for patch 1. This is not critical to have it before 5.
So, after rearrangement it would be 4th followed by 5th (aka patch 1 in
current series).

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy