linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] gpio: pca953x: coding style fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:19:41 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
        Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] gpio: pca953x: coding style fixes

2016-09-07 17:17 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>:
> On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 16:49 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> pca953x_gpio_set_multiple() has some coding style issues that make it
>> harder to read. Tweak the code a bit.
>>
>
> Usually give one day for reviewers to have a chance to follow your
> changes.
>

Sure, I re-posted immediately because the changes were minor.

Thanks,
Bartosz

> And one comment below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> index b08ed52..079c311 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
>> @@ -360,25 +360,27 @@ exit:
>>  }
>>
>>  static void pca953x_gpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *gc,
>> -             unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
>> +                                   unsigned long *mask, unsigned
>> long *bits)
>>  {
>>       struct pca953x_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
>> +     unsigned int bankmask, bankval;
>> +     int bank_shift, bank, ret;
>>       u8 reg_val[MAX_BANK];
>> -     int ret;
>> -     int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
>> -     int bank;
>
> I meant to keep int ret apart.
>
> struct pca953x_chip *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> unsigned int bank_mask, bank_val, bank_shift, bank;
> u8 reg_val[MAX_BANK];
> int ret;
>
> And perhaps _ in the names of bank* to be consistent.
>
>
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> Intel Finland Oy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html