[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160907162025.3t5t6ghposbzc43r@localhost>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 19:20:26 +0300
From: Iaroslav Gridin <voker57@...il.com>
To: Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc: andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: msm8974: Add definitions for QCE & cryptobam
> > + clocks = <&gcc GCC_CE2_AHB_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_CE2_AXI_CLK>,
> > + <&gcc GCC_CE2_CLK>;
> > + clock-names = "bam_clk", "axi_clk", "core_clk";
> > + #dma-cells = <1>;
> > + qcom,ee = <1>;
> > + qcom,controlled-remotely;
> > + };
>
> indentation please.
Similar indentation (tabs then spaces to align) is used all over dts, am I doing it wrong or is
this bad practice?
Example @ line 334:
> interrupts = <0 8 0x4>,
> <0 7 0x4>;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists