[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d6c3b7eb-ba95-1ffa-0453-464e1e24262a@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 09:37:00 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 7 (kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c)
On 09/07/16 00:52, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20160906:
>
on i386:
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'get_sample':
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:258:18: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'
if (sample > tr->max_latency)
^
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:259:6: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'
tr->max_latency = sample;
^
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c: In function 'hwlat_tracer_init':
../kernel/trace/trace_hwlat.c:583:4: error: 'struct trace_array' has no member named 'max_latency'
tr->max_latency = 0;
^
when CONFIG_TRACER_MAX_TRACE is not enabled.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists