lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2016 12:49:58 +0800
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
To:     Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.xyz>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com" <linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] drm/sun4i: Introduce A33 display driver

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:54 AM, Maxime Ripard
<maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:50:09AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> >> The implementation might be along the lines of
>> >>
>> >>   1. having multiple output ports, each for a different interface type.
>> >>      (Some platforms go this route)
>> >>
>> >> Or
>> >>
>> >>   2. having a DT property describe what the output interface is.
>> >>
>> >> The RGB/TCON driver would then setup the registers accordingly.
>> >
>> > Hmmm, yeah, we would need to adjust the bindings too...
>> >
>> > I guess I'd prefer 1), but that would also be the most invasive
>> > solution. I'm not sure how the DT maintainers feel about that.
>>
>> I wonder if the TCON could use its 2 channels simultaneously?
>
> No, it's mutually exclusive.

I don't see how though. Are you referring to the IO_Map_Sel bit?
I assume that only controls the external output pins though.

>> Like output to one LCD, then mirror through HDMI/VGA?
>> The first option would be able to cover this better?
>
> Even if it wasn't exclusive, that wouldn't be possible
> unfortunately. Or rather, this would be possible if the LCD and the
> HDMI screen had the same timings, which is very unlikely.

What about an LCD-VGA bridge + HDMI in mirror mode on sun6i?
That should work.

>> And you still need to add outgoing endpoints for the HDMI block.
>
> Indeed.

On second thought, this particular one shouldn't affect the binding.

>
>> In addition we'll have to rework the TV encoder binding as well.
>>
>> The 2 TV encoders (on the A20) each have four DACs, which map
>> onto 4 external pins. The address space includes a not so easy
>> to use mux. More importantly, the binding needs to specify which
>> pin is used for what signal (RGB, YUV, S/Video, composite).
>> There seems to be an implicit rule that 1 pin is always used
>> for composite, and the 3 others RGB, though.
>
> I'm not sure why we would need to rework this one though. We have no
> way to detect whether the screen is connected or not on either
> connectors, and we can't have both output running at the same time for
> the same reason than mention above.

I would like to add connector nodes. At least we can specify stuff
like what DAC outputs are used for which connector, what type of
connector, and a ddc bus for VGA connectors. I haven't worked out
the details though.

Regards
ChenYu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ