[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZSE=o_qSuBUkTA3FOpunaf7maNsue07L7ZGHyzc4xgMg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 22:41:03 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
Cc: Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Jon Mason <jonmason@...adcom.com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: nsp: constify pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops structures
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:42 PM, Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> wrote:
> Check for pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops structures that are only stored in the
> pctlops field and the pmxops field, respectively, of a pinctrl_desc
> structure. These fields are declared const, so pinctrl_ops and pinmux_ops
> structures that have this property can be declared as const also.
Patch applied.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists