[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160907055547.opp57zyxhlplhxhm@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 07:55:47 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Tracy Smith <tlsmith3777@...il.com>
Cc: Leo Li <pku.leo@...il.com>, Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Gao Pan <pandy.gao@....com>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 06:35:38PM -0500, Tracy Smith wrote:
> >The patch makes it really optional that
> >the probe function won't bailout but just disable the bus recovery function
> >when pinctrl is not available.
>
> in the case of the LS1043A and LS1021A, if the bus recovery function is
> disabled, how will bus recovery occur? Is there no option to recover the
> bus for the LS1021a and LS1043a?
Right. That's the situation that we had for all drivers some time ago.
Most of the time this is no problem.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists