lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJYfc8-34ivvsgaNGW6aCr0MWxTk_gqq0ciVFm9V0+Zjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:22:56 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.kw@...achi.com>
Cc:     Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Hiraku Toyooka <hiraku.toyooka.gu@...achi.com>,
        Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>,
        Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi.tr@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ramoops: introduce generic init/free functions for prz

On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
<nobuhiro.iwamatsu.kw@...achi.com> wrote:
> From: Hiraku Toyooka <hiraku.toyooka.gu@...achi.com>
>
> We modifies initialization and freeing code for prz for generic usage.

Sorry for the delay in getting to this review, I've been catching up
on pstore finally. :)

> This change
>
>  * add generic function __ramoops_init_prz() to reduce redundancy
>    between ramoops_init_prz() and ramoops_init_przs().

Can you split this into a separate patch?

>  * rename 'przs' member in struct ramoops_context to 'dprzs' so that
>    it stands for 'dump przs'.
>  * rename ramoops_init_prz() to ramoops_init_dprzs().

And also these two into a separate patch, since it's just a renaming.
And could you add comments for all the przs, it's getting harder to
read these since they're just single-letter names. :)

>  * change parameter of ramoops_free_przs() from struct ramoops_context *
>    into struct persistent_ram_zone * in order to make it available for
>    all prz array.

I *think* this should be with the first change, so splitting this
email's patch into two patches would make review easier (i.e. first do
renamings, then make functional changes).

> Signed-off-by: Hiraku Toyooka <hiraku.toyooka.gu@...achi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.kw@...achi.com>
> Cc: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@...roid.com>
> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi.tr@...achi.com>
> ---
>  fs/pstore/ram.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram.c b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> index 22416c0..288c5d0 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram.c
> @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(ramoops_ecc,
>                 "bytes ECC)");
>
>  struct ramoops_context {
> -       struct persistent_ram_zone **przs;
> +       struct persistent_ram_zone **dprzs;
>         struct persistent_ram_zone *cprz;
>         struct persistent_ram_zone *fprz;
>         struct persistent_ram_zone *mprz;
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static ssize_t ramoops_pstore_read(u64 *id, enum pstore_type_id *type,
>
>         /* Find the next valid persistent_ram_zone for DMESG */
>         while (cxt->dump_read_cnt < cxt->max_dump_cnt && !prz) {
> -               prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(cxt->przs, &cxt->dump_read_cnt,
> +               prz = ramoops_get_next_prz(cxt->dprzs, &cxt->dump_read_cnt,
>                                            cxt->max_dump_cnt, id, type,
>                                            PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG, 1);
>                 if (!prz_ok(prz))
> @@ -314,10 +314,10 @@ static int notrace ramoops_pstore_write_buf(enum pstore_type_id type,
>         if (part != 1)
>                 return -ENOSPC;
>
> -       if (!cxt->przs)
> +       if (!cxt->dprzs)
>                 return -ENOSPC;
>
> -       prz = cxt->przs[cxt->dump_write_cnt];
> +       prz = cxt->dprzs[cxt->dump_write_cnt];
>
>         hlen = ramoops_write_kmsg_hdr(prz, compressed);
>         if (size + hlen > prz->buffer_size)
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ static int ramoops_pstore_erase(enum pstore_type_id type, u64 id, int count,
>         case PSTORE_TYPE_DMESG:
>                 if (id >= cxt->max_dump_cnt)
>                         return -EINVAL;
> -               prz = cxt->przs[id];
> +               prz = cxt->dprzs[id];
>                 break;
>         case PSTORE_TYPE_CONSOLE:
>                 prz = cxt->cprz;
> @@ -371,21 +371,24 @@ static struct ramoops_context oops_cxt = {
>         },
>  };
>
> -static void ramoops_free_przs(struct ramoops_context *cxt)
> +static void ramoops_free_przs(struct persistent_ram_zone **przs)
>  {
>         int i;
>
> -       cxt->max_dump_cnt = 0;
> -       if (!cxt->przs)
> +       if (!przs)
>                 return;
>
> -       for (i = 0; !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cxt->przs[i]); i++)
> -               persistent_ram_free(cxt->przs[i]);
> -       kfree(cxt->przs);
> +       for (i = 0; i < !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(przs[i]); i++)
> +               persistent_ram_free(przs[i]);
> +       kfree(przs);
>  }
>
> -static int ramoops_init_przs(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
> -                            phys_addr_t *paddr, size_t dump_mem_sz)
> +static int __ramoops_init_prz(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
> +                             struct persistent_ram_zone **prz,
> +                             phys_addr_t *paddr, size_t sz, u32 sig, bool zap);
> +
> +static int ramoops_init_dprzs(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
> +                             phys_addr_t *paddr, size_t dump_mem_sz)
>  {
>         int err = -ENOMEM;
>         int i;
> @@ -402,29 +405,24 @@ static int ramoops_init_przs(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
>         if (!cxt->max_dump_cnt)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       cxt->przs = kzalloc(sizeof(*cxt->przs) * cxt->max_dump_cnt,
> +       cxt->dprzs = kcalloc(cxt->max_dump_cnt, sizeof(*cxt->dprzs),
>                              GFP_KERNEL);
> -       if (!cxt->przs) {
> +       if (!cxt->dprzs) {
>                 dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize a prz array for dumps\n");
>                 goto fail_prz;
>         }
>
>         for (i = 0; i < cxt->max_dump_cnt; i++) {
> -               cxt->przs[i] = persistent_ram_new(*paddr, cxt->record_size, 0,
> -                                                 &cxt->ecc_info,
> -                                                 cxt->memtype);
> -               if (IS_ERR(cxt->przs[i])) {
> -                       err = PTR_ERR(cxt->przs[i]);
> -                       dev_err(dev, "failed to request mem region (0x%zx@...llx): %d\n",
> -                               cxt->record_size, (unsigned long long)*paddr, err);
> +               err = __ramoops_init_prz(dev, cxt, &cxt->dprzs[i], paddr,
> +                                        cxt->record_size, 0, false);
> +               if (err)
>                         goto fail_prz;
> -               }
> -               *paddr += cxt->record_size;
>         }
>
>         return 0;
>  fail_prz:
> -       ramoops_free_przs(cxt);
> +       cxt->max_dump_cnt = 0;
> +       ramoops_free_przs(cxt->dprzs);

And this will need rebasing on the next -next (since the "free" path
has been fixed up to do the right thing):
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git/commit/?h=for-next/pstore&id=a4dd738c8e0503457902ffb2b742a07c9acbc98b

>         return err;
>  }
>
> @@ -432,6 +430,13 @@ static int ramoops_init_prz(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
>                             struct persistent_ram_zone **prz,
>                             phys_addr_t *paddr, size_t sz, u32 sig)
>  {
> +       return __ramoops_init_prz(dev, cxt, prz, paddr, sz, sig, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int __ramoops_init_prz(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
> +                             struct persistent_ram_zone **prz,
> +                             phys_addr_t *paddr, size_t sz, u32 sig, bool zap)
> +{
>         if (!sz)
>                 return 0;
>
> @@ -451,7 +456,8 @@ static int ramoops_init_prz(struct device *dev, struct ramoops_context *cxt,
>                 return err;
>         }
>
> -       persistent_ram_zap(*prz);
> +       if (zap)
> +               persistent_ram_zap(*prz);
>
>         *paddr += sz;
>
> @@ -503,7 +509,7 @@ static int ramoops_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         dump_mem_sz = cxt->size - cxt->console_size - cxt->ftrace_size
>                         - cxt->pmsg_size;
> -       err = ramoops_init_przs(dev, cxt, &paddr, dump_mem_sz);
> +       err = ramoops_init_dprzs(dev, cxt, &paddr, dump_mem_sz);
>         if (err)
>                 goto fail_out;
>
> @@ -573,7 +579,8 @@ fail_init_mprz:
>  fail_init_fprz:
>         persistent_ram_free(cxt->cprz);
>  fail_init_cprz:
> -       ramoops_free_przs(cxt);
> +       cxt->max_dump_cnt = 0;
> +       ramoops_free_przs(cxt->dprzs);
>  fail_out:
>         return err;
>  }
> @@ -591,7 +598,7 @@ static int ramoops_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>         persistent_ram_free(cxt->mprz);
>         persistent_ram_free(cxt->fprz);
>         persistent_ram_free(cxt->cprz);
> -       ramoops_free_przs(cxt);
> +       ramoops_free_przs(cxt->dprzs);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.8.1
>
>

Thanks!

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ