linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next 0/3] r8152: configuration setting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2010259F0@RTITMBSV03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 03:00:57 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 0/3] r8152: configuration setting

David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 8:38 AM
[...]
> By forcing a certain mode via a Kconfig value, you are basically making it
> impossible for distributions to do something reasonable here.

The request is always from some manufacturers, not end users.
They always ask the driver to control everything. And I don't
think the end user knows or cares about how the device is set.
That is why I try to satisfy them via Kconfig.

I think you have rejected this way. I would think if there
is any other method. Thanks.

Best Regards,
Hayes