[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908214748.vywksxm2jycre66o@treble>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:47:48 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
Nilay Vaish <nilayvaish@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] x86/dumpstack: allow preemption in
show_stack_log_lvl() and dump_trace()
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:04:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 14 ++++++--------
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
>
> > +static void *is_softirq_stack(unsigned long *stack);
> > {
>
> FYI, this bit clearly wasn't build tested on 32-bit even once - I'm skipping this
> patch.
Argh, sorry about that. I did a lot of testing on 32-bit with this
patch before. I guess I goofed somehow when I split up the patches.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists