linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 08 Sep 2016 02:37:28 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
        Juri Lelli <Juri.Lelli@....com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Doug Smythies <doug.smythies@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH 0/4] cpufreq / sched: iowait boost in intel_pstate and schedutil

On Wednesday, September 07, 2016 05:22:26 PM Steve Muckle wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 02:56:48AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Please let me know what you think and if you can run some benchmarks you
> > care about and see if the changes make any difference (this way or another),
> > please do that and let me know what you've found.
> 
> LGTM (I just reviewed the first and last patch, skipping the
> intel_pstate ones).
> 
> I was unable to see a conclusive power regression in Android audio, video or
> idle usecases on my hikey 96board.

Cool, thanks!