linux-kernel - Re: bcache vs bcachefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 7 Sep 2016 20:24:50 -0800
From:   Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@...il.com>,
        Harald Dunkel <harri@...ics.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bcache vs bcachefs

On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 11:01:40PM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 07:55:52AM -0800, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > That said, I'm not advocating people rush out to throw bcachefs on their servers
> > or use it without backups yet, it's still young and needs more widespread
> > testing.
> 
> Hi Kent!
> 
> Have you started using xfstests to stress test bcachefs yet?

Yep, since I had enough of a filesystem to test.

> You may be interested in reading through this presentation, especially
> the last slide.  :-)
> 
> 	   https://thunk.org/gce-xfstests

Looks similar conceptually to my own xfstests wrapper...

lol @ the last slide :)