[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908061219.GK18398@leon.nu>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 09:12:19 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
Cc: cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Liran Liss <liranl@...lanox.com>,
"Hefty, Sean" <sean.hefty@...el.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>,
Haggai Eran <haggaie@...lanox.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, james.l.morris@...cle.com,
serge@...lyn.com, Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 1/3] rdmacg: Added rdma cgroup controller
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 08:37:23PM +0530, Parav Pandit wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> >> Signed-off-by: Parav Pandit <pandit.parav@...il.com>
> >> +static struct rdmacg_resource_pool *
> >> +get_cg_rpool_locked(struct rdma_cgroup *cg, struct rdmacg_device *device)
> >> +{
> >> + struct rdmacg_resource_pool *rpool;
> >> +
> >> + rpool = find_cg_rpool_locked(cg, device);
> >> + if (rpool)
> >> + return rpool;
> >> +
> >> + rpool = kzalloc(sizeof(*rpool), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!rpool)
> >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >> +
> >> + rpool->device = device;
> >> + set_all_resource_max_limit(rpool);
> >> +
> >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rpool->cg_node);
> >> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rpool->dev_node);
> >> + list_add_tail(&rpool->cg_node, &cg->rpools);
> >> + list_add_tail(&rpool->dev_node, &device->rpools);
> >> + return rpool;
> >> +}
> >
> > <...>
> >
> >> + for (p = cg; p; p = parent_rdmacg(p)) {
> >> + rpool = get_cg_rpool_locked(p, device);
> >> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(rpool)) {
> >
> > get_cg_rpool_locked always returns !NULL (error, or pointer)
>
> Can this change go as incremental change after this patch, since this
> patch is close to completion?
> Or I need to revise v13?
Sure, it is cleanup. It is not worth of respinning.
>
> >
> >> + ret = PTR_ERR(rpool);
> >> + goto err;
> >
> > I didn't review the whole series yet.
>
> Did you get a chance to review the series?
We need to decide on fundamental question before reviewing it, which is
"how to fit rdmacg to new ABI model".
Thanks
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists