[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160908061851.GB8913@lukather>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 08:18:51 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
To: jorik@...pendief.biz
Cc: wens@...e.org, mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] dts: sun8i-h3: clarify uart1 pinmux definition
name
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 09:58:55AM +0200, jorik@...pendief.biz wrote:
> From: Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorik Jonker <jorik@...pendief.biz>
Commit log?
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-bananapi-m2-plus.dts | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-bananapi-m2-plus.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-bananapi-m2-plus.dts
> index 3779280..45f623b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-bananapi-m2-plus.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3-bananapi-m2-plus.dts
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@
>
> &uart1 {
> pinctrl-names = "default";
> - pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins_a>;
> + pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_rts_cts_pins>;
> status = "okay";
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> index ee10004..933d42c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun8i-h3.dtsi
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@
> allwinner,pull = <SUN4I_PINCTRL_NO_PULL>;
> };
>
> - uart1_pins_a: uart1@0 {
> + uart1_rts_cts_pins: uart1_rts_cts {
> allwinner,pins = "PG6", "PG7", "PG8", "PG9";
I'd prefer to have one pinctrl node for RX/TX, and one for
RTS/CTS. That way, we don't have to duplicate the nodes for the boards
that want to enable only RX/TX
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists