linux-kernel - Re: lsl / lsr possible confusion in v7_flush_dcache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160908095004.GF14909@vsiles-Desktop>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 11:50:05 +0200
From:   Vincent Siles <vincent.siles@...venrun.com>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: lsl / lsr possible confusion in v7_flush_dcache_all

Oh, right. I missed that !

Thank you for the help.
Best,
Vincent

On 08-09-16 10:38:01, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:15:20AM +0200, Vincent Siles wrote:
> > While reading the v7_flush_dcache_all (arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S), I
> > stumbled upon this line:
> > 
> > # r10 is the current cache level
> > 127: add    r2, r10, r10, lsr #1	    @ work out 3x current cache level
> > 
> > If we want r2 to be 3 * r10, we should compute r10 + (r10 << 1), which
> > is lsl, not lsr.
> > 
> > I check for a recent kernel, the issue seems to still be here:
> > repo:       git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> > revision:   d71f058617564750261b673ea9b3352382b9cde4
> 
> This code is take pretty much verbatim from the ARM ARM and, despite
> being fairly obfuscated, does what it says on the tin. r10 is incremented
> by 2 each time round the loop, so this is basically doing 2i + (2i / 2).
> 
> Will

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)