lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:21:15 +0200 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com> Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the char-misc tree with the net-next tree On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 04:51:12PM +0000, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > It isn't so much about the Pull Request, more about having a single pre-merged > location and making sure that everyone is on the same page for testing. I don't understand. If you want to have a git tree, for testing in linux-next, that's fine, but I still need/want patches in email to take things to be merged "properly" on through to Linus for the sections of the hv code that go through me. thanks, greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists