linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 12/19] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support and force mode to resource amending function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:02:09 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     loic pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
Cc:     bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, ohad@...ery.com,
        linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...inux.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/19] remoteproc: core: Add vdev support and force
 mode to resource amending function

On Thu, 08 Sep 2016, loic pallardy wrote:

> 
> 
> On 09/08/2016 10:48 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Aug 2016, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> > 
> > > This patch proposes diverse updates to rproc_update_resource_table_entry
> > > function:
> > > - rename rproc_update_resource_table_entry to __update_rsc_tbl_entry to
> > >   have shorter function name.
> > > - add RSC_VDEV support
> > > - add force mode resource even if resource already fixed on firmware side.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Loic Pallardy <loic.pallardy@...com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > index 30e9c70..aff1a00 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > > @@ -1027,13 +1027,15 @@ static int __verify_rsc_tbl_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
> > >  	return -EINVAL;
> > >  }
> > > 
> > > -static int rproc_update_resource_table_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
> > > +static int __update_rsc_tbl_entry(struct rproc *rproc,
> > 
> > Unless the name is unruly, (which I don't think it is, you're still
> > having to line wrap at the call site), I tend to go for clarity over
> > brevity.
> It was only to have reasonable line length. I can keept original name and
> see impact on rest of the code.

Reasonable line length is 80.  This line was 65.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog