[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1473337655.11323.94.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 15:27:35 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Vignesh R <vigneshr@...com>, Yong Li <yong.b.li@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] gpio: pca953x: make the define names consistent
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 12:48 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The register offset defines for the pca953x and pca957x expander
> families should have the same names to better reflect their similar
> purposes.
> chip->regs = &pca957x_regs;
>
> - ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_OUT, chip->reg_output);
> + ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_OUTPUT, chip-
> >reg_output);
> if (ret)
> goto out;
> - ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_CFG, chip-
> >reg_direction);
> + ret = pca953x_read_regs(chip, PCA957X_DIRECTION, chip-
> >reg_direction);
Bu we may use chip->regs->direction here, right? And output before.
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists