linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rlimits: report resource limits violations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <479b4d53-b54c-16a2-ddfa-47bb8857fd0c@stressinduktion.org>
Date:   Thu, 8 Sep 2016 15:09:20 +0200
From:   Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aris@...hat.com, jolsa@...hat.com,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/2] rlimits: report resource limits violations

On 07.09.2016 23:20, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 01:27:35PM +0300, Yauheni Kaliuta wrote:
>> The patch instrument different places of resource limits checks with
>> reporting using the infrastructure from the previous patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/ia64/kernel/perfmon.c                 |  4 +++-
>>  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c           |  6 ++++--
>>  arch/powerpc/mm/mmu_context_iommu.c        |  6 ++++--
>>  drivers/android/binder.c                   |  7 ++++++-
>>  drivers/infiniband/core/umem.c             |  1 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/user_pages.c    |  5 ++++-
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_user_pages.c |  1 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c   |  1 +
>>  drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c           |  1 +
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c        |  6 ++++--
>>  drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c            |  4 ++++
>>  fs/attr.c                                  |  4 +++-
>>  fs/binfmt_aout.c                           |  4 +++-
>>  fs/binfmt_flat.c                           |  1 +
>>  fs/coredump.c                              |  4 +++-
>>  fs/exec.c                                  | 14 ++++++++++----
>>  fs/file.c                                  | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>  fs/select.c                                |  4 +++-
>>  include/linux/mm.h                         |  7 ++++++-
>>  ipc/mqueue.c                               | 10 ++++++++--
>>  ipc/shm.c                                  |  1 +
>>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c                       | 15 ++++++++++++---
>>  kernel/events/core.c                       |  1 +
>>  kernel/fork.c                              |  9 ++++++---
>>  kernel/sched/core.c                        | 17 +++++++++++++----
>>  kernel/signal.c                            |  7 ++++---
>>  kernel/sys.c                               |  9 ++++++---
>>  kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c             |  8 ++++++++
>>  mm/mlock.c                                 | 14 +++++++++++++-
>>  mm/mmap.c                                  | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>>  mm/mremap.c                                |  4 +++-
>>  net/unix/af_unix.c                         |  9 ++++++---
>>  32 files changed, 179 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
> 
> I'm certainly not excited that we'd need to maintain this
> rlimit tracking for foreseeable future.
> I can be convinced otherwise, but so far I don't see
> strong enough use case that warrants these changes all over.

Other operating systems actually allow reporting of those events up till
syslog. I does have some value to get to this information at all (how I
hate silent errors on iPhones with Jetsam because of resource limitations).

Some way to centrally notify about those would actually be a nice thing
to have.

Bye,
Hannes